Pass exam with C_DBADM_2601 Top Exam Collection for sure one-shot

CHALLENGE 1 - First Close Configuration Traceability
The close coordinator wants to compare runtime between the newly installed validation database and the upgraded claims reporting system. The installed database record is complete, but the upgraded system record is missing a configuration value used during rehearsal. Which action best supports a defensible comparison?

• A. Compare the runtimes as-is because both databases returned report outputs.
• B. Exclude the installed database because only the upgraded system supports close reporting.
• C. Replace the upgraded system record with the installed database record for consistency.
• D. Update the upgraded system's administration record before using the runtime comparison.

CHALLENGE 1 - Plant Wave Configuration Evidence Alignment
During rollout preparation, plant quality test users can connect to both SAP HANA reporting systems. The newly installed wave database has its active configuration documented, but the upgraded pilot system still has one stabilization value recorded only in a local operations note. What should the administrator do before accepting the rollout comparison?

• A. Remove the documented value from the wave database record so both records appear similar.
• B. Accept the comparison because both systems allow reporting connections.
• C. Continue the rollout and review the local operations note after plant users begin testing.
• D. Reconcile the pilot configuration value into the central administration record before acceptance.

A regional subscription meal company runs SAP HANA for delivery forecast analytics. SAP HANA cockpit shows normal database availability, but the operations team sees that a memory consumption graph has a gap during the nightly planning run. The alert log has no critical entry, yet planners reported slower dashboard response during that same interval. A support coordinator suggests lowering the memory alert threshold to catch the next occurrence.
The constraint is that the administrator must restore trustworthy monitoring evidence before changing alert sensitivity. The next planning run must allow the team to correlate workload behavior with memory evidence.
Which action best addresses the monitoring gap?

• A. Verify and correct the memory metric collection path, monitor the next planning run, and validate that the graph captures the interval.
• B. Ignore the graph gap because no critical alert was created and the database remained available.
• C. Restart the database before the next planning run so the memory graph begins with a clean measurement baseline.
• D. Lower the memory alert threshold so the next planning run produces a clearer alert.

A regional textile exporter is rehearsing migration from SAP HANA on-premises to SAP HANA Cloud. The migration preparation checklist confirms that the source database backup was completed, and the cloud target is reachable through database explorer. Before the transfer window, the administrator notices that the checklist does not record whether the source backup was selected as the migration baseline for this rehearsal. The project lead wants to continue because both source backup and target access are confirmed.
The constraint is that the rehearsal must use a clearly identified source baseline so results can be traced after import. The team must avoid a transfer that cannot be tied back to the exact prepared source state.
Which recommendation best addresses the migration preparation risk?

• A. Continue the transfer because a source backup exists and the SAP HANA Cloud target is reachable.
• B. Defer baseline recording until after import because migrated query results will show whether the correct source state was used.
• C. Repeat target connection testing because the missing source baseline means the cloud target readiness is uncertain.
• D. Record the selected source backup as the migration baseline, validate that it matches the rehearsal scope, and proceed only after baseline evidence is complete.

A regional healthcare supply wholesaler runs SAP HANA for distribution analytics. SAP HANA cockpit shows the database as available, but the operations dashboard displays normal response time while a workload review shows a short queue increase during invoice analytics processing. Users reported a delay during the same interval. The support lead suggests increasing response-time thresholds because the dashboard did not show a severe issue.
The constraint is that the administrator must explain the delay using consistent monitoring evidence before changing thresholds. The next invoice analytics cycle must remain observable without masking the symptom.
Which action best supports correct troubleshooting?

• A. Increase response-time thresholds so minor delays no longer appear as operational concerns.
• B. Restart SAP HANA before the next invoice analytics cycle to reset both response-time and queue measurements.
• C. Ignore the workload queue increase because the operations dashboard showed normal response time.
• D. Compare the dashboard interval with workload queue evidence, validate the timing relationship, and investigate the queue source before changing thresholds.